The conditions of this test were extreme and do not represent normal operation. The experimenters could not confirm any audible difference between polypropelene and ceramic in many ABX tests under normal conditions. The condition that produced the above result of a difference was applying a 3.6 Watt heat source next to the capacitors. Even though the capacitor test circuit was not enclosed, with the added heat the ceramics lost capacitance to such an extent that the system's low frequence response was rolled off by 3 dB at 40 Hz. |
This experimental result should have been no surprise to any engineer and points only to the well known caution against using temperature sensitive ceramics in environments with varying temperature. |
The specific capacitors had been provided by a person who claimed these specific capacitors would sound differnt under normal audio use. That claim was not be confirmed by the experiments. |
Prior to the subjective testing, the capacitors were measured for value and dissipation factor on a bridge. The thermal sensitivity of the ceramic capacitors was noted at that point. Distortion was measured also and it was found that the ceramic capacitors could be made to show as much as 0.26% THD under realtively heavy load conditions. The polypropelene capacitors with the same loading did not exceed the measurement residual of 0.009%. The circuit used for the subjective test used the capacitors for coupling between a low impedance output buffer and a 100 kilohm input stage. In this circuit only minor distortion differences were measurable at around the 0.01% THD level. |